CHRONOPHARMACOVIGILANCE: TIME-DEPENDENT PATTERNS OF ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS AND THEIR REGULATORY IMPLICATIONS

Said Salim Said1image, Burhani Simai1image, Ahmad Makame Mwadini1image, Sabra Salim Rashid2image

1Zanzibar Food and Drug Agency (ZFDA), Zanzibar, Tanzania.

2Medicine Policy Unit, Ministry of Health, Zanzibar, Tanzania.

 

Abstract

Chronopharmacology is the study of the effects of biological rhythms, especially circadian rhythms, on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs and their therapeutic efficacy and safety. The rhythmic nature of physiological functions like hormone secretion, enzymatic activity, gastrointestinal function, renal clearance, cardiovascular function, and immune response plays an important role in governing the temporal profiles of absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of drugs. There is increasing evidence that adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are not randomly timed but rather follow a predictable pattern with a close association with biological clocks. Therefore, the onset of medication can have a profound effect on either the occurrence or intensity of ADRs. This review focuses on the issue of time-dependent patterns of ADRs in the integrated framework of chrono-pharmacology and chronopharmacovigilance. It outlines the mechanistic explanations provided by circadian biology to time-dependent patterns of drug safety and clinical evidence of time-dependent differences in the occurrence of ADRs in a broad range of therapeutic classes. The data underscores the challenges of conventional pharmacovigilance where biological timing is not considered as a drug-related risk factor. The review also delves into the implications that time-dependent patterns of ADRs have on pharmacovigilance and regulation. The use of time-dependent variables in drug safety monitoring, trial designs, and risk management plans may enable better signal detection and improved benefit-risk assessments. The use of chronopharmacological concepts in regulatory science can, therefore, facilitate the development of personalized medicine, where the dosing regimen will be optimized for safety. It can, therefore, be concluded that the appreciation of temporal variability in ADRs is an important milestone in more accurate drug safety profiling.

Keywords: Adverse drug reactions, chronopharmacovigilance, circadian rhythm, drug safety, pharmacovigilance, regulatory science.

 

INTRODUCTION

 

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) remain one of the major health concerns worldwide, contributing largely to patient morbidity, unnecessary hospitalization, hospital stay, and rising healthcare costs. ADRs remain among the list of reasons for treatment-related harm despite advancements in drug development, regulation, and post-marketing surveillance1. The conventional pharmacovigilance approach has largely focused on a set of known variables such as the dose of a drug, the duration of therapy, patient demographics, associated diseases, genetic susceptibility, and interactions between multiple drugs2,3. Although these factors are of utmost importance, they fail to incorporate an essential aspect of drug exposure: administration of drugs in the context of their endogenous rhythms2.

Chronopharmacology provides a strong scientific basis to explain the temporal differences in the efficacy and toxicity of drugs by correlating pharmacological response with circadian biology4,5. The circadian rhythms, controlled by the central biological clock and peripheral clocks in the principal organs of the body, are characterized by predictable changes in physiological and biochemical functions on a 24 hrs cycle5. Secretion of hormones, gastrointestinal motility, expression of hepatic enzymes, renal blood flow, the immune system, and repair mechanisms in cells vary in a time-dependent manner6. Circadian rhythms have a direct effect on the pharmacokinetics of drugs and tissue sensitivity to drugs. This means that the same drugs taken at different times of the day can have a vastly different safety profile7.

Increasing clinical and experimental evidence has shown that ADRs do not occur in a random fashion over time but, rather, follow predictable patterns of time. For instance, sedative response, hypotensive reactions, gastrointestinal intolerance, and immunologically mediated responses may be enhanced or reduced based on the circadian rhythm. The assumption of a time-invariant risk of drugs is thus challenged8. It is this awareness that has led to the development of chronopharmacovigilance a relatively new branch that involves time factors in pharma-covigilance practice9. The aim of chronopharma-covigilance is to discover, analyze, and interpret time-series data of ADRs by evaluating the timing of drug administration in relation to the circadian rhythm and periodic physiological variations, in addition to the traditional risk factors. This method has the potential to optimize signal detection and help resolve inconsistencies in ADR reports10.

In terms of regulatory science, the implications of identifying time-dependent ADRs are far-reaching. It leads to more accurate assessments of benefit and risk, and it is consistent with regulatory visions of patient-centered and precision medicine10. This review article brings together the collective knowledge that exists concerning the nature of ADRs in terms of time and focuses on the role of chronopharmacovigilance as an emerging area of research for improving drug safety surveillance and decision-making11.

Concept and scope of chronopharmacovigilance

Chronopharmacovigilance may be defined as the scientific evaluation of the changes in the number of adverse drug reactions that follow a circadian, diurnal, and seasonal pattern12. Clock time, as opposed to the calendar time mentioned in traditional pharmaco-vigilance, becomes an important concern in chrono-pharmacovigilance13.

The field of chronopharmacovigilance encompasses:

Such an approach is in line with the general shift towards personalized and precision medicine, where the treatment not only targets the patient but also the timing of the biological processes13,14.

Biological basis of time-dependent adverse drug reactions

1. Circadian regulation of drug metabolism

Circadian expression and activity of drug-metabolizing enzymes like cytochrome P450 have been noticed15. The level of expression and availability of the hepatic enzyme varies from day to night. This results in variations in the plasma levels of drugs, giving higher peaks of exposure and toxicity16,17.

2. Variability in drug transport and distribution

Membrane transporters which play a role in the absorption and excretion of drugs, such as P-glycoprotein and organic anion transporters, have a circadian rhythm. Other factors like gastrointestinal motility and gastric pH also change daily, influencing drug absorption and potentially giving a time-dependent gastrointestinal ADR18,19.

3. Circadian sensitivity of target organs

The rhythmic responsiveness of organ systems to pharmaceutical provocations also exists. For example:

These rhythms can accentuate or ameliorate drug-induced adverse reactions depending on the timing of their administration20,21,22.

Clinical evidence for time-dependent ADRs

There is cumulative evidence for the importance of chronopharmacovigilance. Antihypertensive drugs can cause excessive nighttime hypotension when given at night23. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs show time-dependent gastrointestinal and renal toxicity. Central nervous system drugs can cause increased sedation or dizziness when given during the night24.

In the post-marketing environment, the clustering of ADR reports at certain times of day has been noted in spontaneous reporting databases. However, this information is not commonly analyzed systematically, indicating an opportunity to improve the analysis of safety signals by considering times of day25.

Challenges in chronopharmacovigilance

However, chronopharmacovigilance has some challenges despite its potential:

However, these approaches have some limitations that could be overcome by the use of advanced analysis techniques such as time-stratified disproportionality analysis and the integration of real-world evidence29.

Regulatory Implications

1. Impact on PSURs and signal detection

The effect of the regulations in this section on the preparation of PSURs has been described above30. The regulations about the content of the PSUR have implications for signal detection, since they contain requirements regarding the presentation of information on the submission documentation in the Master File30,31.

The use of time variables in PSUR evaluation may help to improve the detection of safety signals and benefit-risk profiles. Time trends in ADRs can explain discrepancies observed between populations and studies32.

2. Risk management plans and labeling

Results from chronopharmacovigilance may help illuminate specific risk minimization actions, including the timing of doses to avoid risks of adverse drug reactions. Future product labeling by regulatory agencies may include aspects of time of administration, not only in efficacy but in safety as well33.

3. Relevance for low- and middle-income countries

In resource limited settings, where the pharmaco-vigilance system is still in its developing stages, chronopharmacovigilance can be done in a cost-effective manner to improve safety outcomes through the optimization of existing therapies rather than new ones34.

Future directions

The future of chronopharmacovigilance is in:

The integration of chronopharmacovigilance into regulatory science could be a paradigm shift in the post-marketing surveillance of drugs37. 

 

CONCLUSION

 

Chronopharmacovigilance adds a crucial time factor to pharmacovigilance. This new field takes into account the fact that adverse drug reactions are not randomly distributed in time. Chronopharmacovigilance is a new field that improves current knowledge about drug risk profiles and contributes to making more accurate decisions. The integration of the concept of biological time into pharmacovigilance systems could improve the safety of patients, provide optimal results, and advance the development of personalized medicine. With the evolution of pharmacovigilance regulations, chronopharmacovigilance should be considered an integral part of pharmacovigilance.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

 

The author would like to acknowledge all researchers whose work contributed to the evidence summarized in this review.

 

AUTHOR’S CONTRIBUTIONS

 

Salim S: writing the original draft, methodology, investigation. Rashid SS: literature survey, data processing. Final manuscript was checked and approved by both authors. 

 

DATA AVAILABILITY 

 

The datasets generated or analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

 

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

 

None to declare.

 

REFERENCES

 

  1. Cosgrave N, Frydenlund J, Beirne F, et al. Hospital admissions due to adverse drug reactions and adverse drug events in older adults: A systematic review. Age Ageing 2025; 54(8): 231. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf231
  2. An Overview of Traditional Pharmacovigilance Methods - CLINI INDIA'. https://www.cliniindia.com/an-overview-of-traditional-pharmacovigilance-methods/
  3. Algarvio RC, Conceição J, Rodrigues PP, et al. Artificial intelligence in pharmacovigilance: A narrative review and practical experience with an expert-defined Bayesian network tool, Int J Clin Pharm 2025; 47(4): 932-944.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-025-01975-3
  1. Garashi H, Steinke D, Schafheutle E. Strengths and weaknesses of the pharmacovigilance systems in three Arab countries: A mixed-methods study using the WHO pharmacovigilance indicators. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19(5): 2518. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19052518
  2. Piedras ALR, Sánchez UB, Hernández EGO, Romero AC. Chronopharmacokinetics: A brief analysis of the influence of circadian rhythm on the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination of drugs. Biomed Pharmacol J 2024;17:3. https://dx.doi.org/10.13005/bpj/3003
  3. Richards K, Gumz ML. Mechanism of the circadian clock in physiology'. Am J Physiol - Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2013; 304(12): R1053. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00066.2013
  4. Ayyar VS, Sukumaran S. Circadian rhythms: Influence on physiology, pharmacology, and therapeutic interventions. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 2021; 48(3):321.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10928-021-09751-2
  1. Kaşkal M, Sevim M, Ülker G, et al. The clinical impact of chronopharmacology on current medicine', Naunyn. Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 2025; 398(6):6179.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-025-03788-7
  1. Nahmias Y, Androulakis IP. Circadian effects of drug responses. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2021; 23: 203.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-082120-034725
  1. ONYEJI CO. Pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions mediated     by     organic     cation transporters: Are anti-malarial drugs significantly affected? Universal J Pharm Res 2024; 9(2): 69-75. http://doi.org/10.22270/ujpr.v9i2.1092  
  2. Karimi I,  Yakhchalian  N, Fathi  M,  Miraghaee SS. Pharmacogenomic considerations for prescribing   the   antidepressant   fluoxetine:   A review   in   personalized medicine.   Universal J    Pharm    Res    2022; 7(3):74-80.https://doi.org/10.22270/ujpr.v7i3.779 
  1. Dobrek L. Chronopharmacology in therapeutic drug monitoring-dependencies between the rhythmics of pharmacokinetic processes and drug concentration in blood. Pharmaceutics 2021; 13(11): 1915.https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13111915
  1. Ledieu T, Bouzillé G, Polard E, et al. Clinical data analytics with time-related graphical user interfaces: application to pharmacovigilance. Front Pharmacol 2018; 9:717.https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.00717
  1. Ledieu T, Bouzillé G, Thiessard F, et al. Timeline representation of clinical data: usability and added value for pharmacovigilance. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2018; 18:86. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-018-0667-x
  2. Deng J, Guo L, Wu B. Circadian regulation of hepatic cytochrome P450 2a5 by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ', Drug Metab Dispos 2018; 46(11): 1538-1545. https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.118.083071
  3. Lin Y, Wang S, Zhou Z, et al. Bmal1 regulates circadian expression of cytochrome P450 3a11 and drug metabolism in mice. Commun Biol 2019; 2:378.https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-019-0607-z
  1. Zhang YKJ, Yeager RL, Klaassen CD. Circadian expression profiles of drug-processing genes and transcription factors in mouse liver. Drug Metab Dispos 2009; 37(1): 106-115.https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.108.024174
  1. Kervezee L, Hartman R, Berg DJ, et al. Diurnal variation in p-glycoprotein-mediated transport and cerebrospinal fluid turnover in the brain. AAPS J 2014; 16(5): 1029-1037.https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-014-9625-4
  1. McCormick JW, Vogel PD, Wise JG. Multiple drug transport pathways through human p-glycoprotein. Biochemi 2015; 54(28): 4374-4390.https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.5b00018
  1. Nahmias Y, Androulakis IP. Circadian effects of drug responses. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2021; 23:203-224.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-082120-034725
  1. Ayyar VS, Sukumaran S. Circadian rhythms: Influence on physiology, pharmacology, and therapeutic interventions. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 2021; 48(3):321-338.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10928-021-09751-2
  1. Ruan W, Yuan X, Eltzschig HK. Circadian rhythm as a therapeutic target. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2021; 20(4):287-307.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-020-00109-w
  1. Nahmias Y, Androulakis IP. Circadian effects of drug responses. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2021; 23:203-224.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-082120-034725
  1. Murphy PJ, Badia P, Myers BL, et al. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs affect normal sleep patterns in humans. Physiol Behav 1994; 55(6): 1063-1066.https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(94)90388-3
  1. Nahmias Y, Androulakis IP. Circadian effects of drug responses. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2021; 23:203-224.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-082120-034725
  1. Salvador MR, Monteiro C, Pereira L, Duarte AP. Quality of spontaneous reports of adverse drug reactions sent to a regional pharmacovigilance unit. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19(7): 3754.https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19073754
  1. Ponnusankar S, Tejaswini M, Chaitanya M. Assessment of adverse drug reactions based on spontaneous signals at secondary care public hospital. Indian J Pharm Sci 2015; 77, (4):490-493. https://doi.org/10.4103/0250-474X.164771
  2. Asiamah M, Akuffo KO, Nortey P, Donkor N, Danso-Appiah A. Spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reaction among health professionals in Ghana. Arch Public Health 2022; 80: 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-021-00783-1
  1. The Key Role of Pharmacovigilance in Real-World Evidence (RWE) Generation | Pro Pharma Research Organization'. https://propharmaresearch.com/en/resources/diffusion/role-pharmacovigilance-real-world-evidence-rwe-generation
  2. PSUR submission workflow - PharmaRegulatory.in - India's Regulatory Knowledge Hub'. Accessed: Dec. 18, 2025. [Online]. https://www.pharmaregulatory.in/tag/psur-submission-workflow/
  3. Periodic safety update reports (PSURs) | European Medicines Agency (EMA)'. Accessed: Dec. 18, 2025. [Online]. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatory-overview/post-authorisation/pharmacovigilance-post-authorisation/periodic-safety-update-reports-psurs
  4. Gordillo-Marañón M, Candore G, López-Fauqued M, et al. Predicting the submission frequency of periodic safety update reports: development and application of the EURD tool. Front Med 2024; 11:129.https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1299190
  1. Coleman JJ, Pontefract SK. Adverse drug reactions. Clin Med 2016; 16(5): 481-485.https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.16-5-481
  1. Olsson S, Pal SN, Dodoo A. Pharmacovigilance in resource-limited countries. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2015; 8(4): 449-460. https://doi.org/10.1586/17512433.2015.1053391
  2. Arlett P, Straus S, Rasi G. Pharmacovigilance 2030. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2020; 107(1): 89-91.https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1689  
  1. Silva L, Pacheco T, Araújo E, et al., Unveiling the future: Precision pharmacovigilance in the era of personalized medicine. Int J Clin Pharm 2024; 46(3):755-760.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-024-01709-x
  1. Trifirò G, Crisafulli S. A new era of pharmacovigilance: Future challenges and opportunities. Front Drug Saf Regul 2022; 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdsfr.2022.866898