COPING WITH CANCER OF THE LUNG: PSYCHOLOGICAL ADAPTATION AND RESILIENCE PATHWAYS 

Emmanuel Ifeanyi Obeagu1*image, Aakib Rahman Parray2image

1Department of Biomedical and Laboratory Science, Africa University, Mutare, Zimbabwe.

2Department of Psychology, Akal University, Talwandi Sabo, India.

 

Abstract

Lung cancer poses not just serious physical obstacles but also considerable emotional suffering, affecting patients’ mental well-being and overall quality of life. The diagnosis frequently provokes strong emotional responses such as fear, anxiety, and sorrow, further intensified by stigma and changes to identity. Psychological adjustment the manner in which individuals emotionally and cognitively adapt to the truths of their condition is essential for effective coping. Resilience, which is the capacity to sustain or recover psychological health in the face of challenges, is crucial for promoting positive adaptation to lung cancer. This review compiles existing insights on the coping mechanisms and resilience approaches used by lung cancer patients. Adaptive coping strategies like cognitive reframing, solving problems, and obtaining social support assist in reducing distress and enhancing emotional regulation. Factors that protect, such as robust social connections, spirituality, and previous coping experiences, enhance resilience. Therapeutic approaches, particularly cognitive-behavioral therapy, mindfulness-based stress reduction, and meaning centered psychotherapy, additionally boost patients’ ability to handle psychological difficulties and maintain hope. Healthcare professionals play a crucial role in promoting psychological adjustment and resilience through compassionate communication, regular mental health assessments, and coordinated psychosocial assistance

Keywords: Lung cancer, coping strategies, psychological adaptation, psycho-oncology, resilience.

 

INTRODUCTION

 

Lung cancer is still one of the most widespread and lethal cancers worldwide, with approximately 2 million new cases and over 1.7 million fatalities each year1,2. Despite improvements in diagnosis and treatments, the prognosis for lung cancer often remains bleak, creating considerable physical and emotional challenges for patients3,4. Receiving a diagnosis typically initiates a difficult journey filled with complicated medical choices, severe symptoms, and significant psychological strain5,6. This psycho-logical strain is a vital, yet frequently over-looked, facet of lung cancer treatment that greatly affects patients' quality of life and their treatment results7. Adjusting psychologically to lung cancer is a complex process where patients attempt to accept their diagnosis and its consequences for their futures8. This includes coping with powerful emotions like fear, anxiety, depression, and sorrow, as well as adapting to the physical restrictions and changed social roles brought about by the disease9,10. Patients with lung cancer frequently face distinct stressors, such as a high risk of mortality and social stigma associated with the disease’s strong connection to smoking11. These elements can undermine patients' sense of identity and hinder their capacity to preserve a coherent self-image, making psychological adapt- ation even more challenging12,13.

The stigma linked to lung cancer intensifies psychological distress by provoking emotions of shame, self-blame, and social withdrawal. Patients often absorb negative societal views that hold them responsible for their condition, particularly if they smoked in the past. This self-stigmatization not only heightens emotional pain but also hinders the pursuit of psychosocial support, obstructing effective coping14-17. Tackling this stigma is vital for enhancing mental health results and encouraging adaptive coping mechanisms. Resilience the ability to sustain or recover psychological well-being amidst challenges is becoming increasingly acknowledged as an essential element in managing lung cancer18,19. It allows patients to handle the emotional distress of diagnosis, treatment, and disease advancement while maintaining hope and purpose in their lives.20 Factors like social support, spirituality, and adaptive coping strategies foster resilience19. Additionally, psychological approaches designed to boost resilience have proven effective in alleviating distress and enhancing life quality21.

Coping strategies in lung cancer patients vary widely, ranging from problem-focused efforts to manage symptoms and treatment to emotion-focused approaches that regulate distress and promote acceptance. Adaptive coping strategies, such as seeking information, engaging in social support, and cognitive reframing, have been linked to better psychological adjustment22-24. Conversely, mal-adaptive strategies like avoidance and denial often lead to poorer mental health outcomes25. Healthcare providers play a pivotal role in supporting patients’ psychological adaptation and resilience. Effective communication, early identification of distress, and integrated psychosocial care are key elements in fostering mental well-being26,27. Multidisciplinary care models that incorporate psycho-oncology services alongside medical treatment improve emotional outcomes and patient satisfaction28,29. 

This narrative review aims to explore the psychological adaptation processes and resilience pathways in individuals diagnosed with lung cancer. It seeks to examine the coping strategies employed by patients, identify protective factors that foster resilience, and evaluate the role of healthcare interventions in supporting mental well-being. The review intends to provide insights that can inform comprehensive psycho-oncology care and improve psychological outcomes for lung cancer patients.

Psychological adaptation in lung cancer

Psychological adaptation refers to the ongoing process through which lung cancer patients adjust to the emotional, cognitive, and social challenges posed by their diagnosis and treatment30,31. The diagnosis of lung cancer often triggers a profound emotional response, characterized by shock, fear, anxiety, depression, and grief.32 These initial reactions reflect the existential threat posed by the disease, as well as uncertainty about prognosis and treatment outcomes. Patients must grapple not only with physical symptoms but also with the psychological impact of facing a potentially life-threatening illness.33. As patients move through the cancer trajectory, adaptation involves finding ways to manage distress and integrate the illness experience into their sense of self34. This process can include acceptance of the diagnosis, emotional regulation, and the development of coping strategies that facilitate adjustment34,35. Effective psychological adaptation enables patients to maintain hope, engage actively with treatment, and preserve their quality of life despite adversity. Conversely, maladaptive responses such as denial, avoidance, or excessive rumination may exacerbate psychological distress and interfere with medical adherence and social functioning36.

Several factors influence the course of psychological adaptation in lung cancer. The severity of symptoms, stage of disease, and treatment side effects can affect patients’ emotional resilience37. Social determinants, including access to support networks and healthcare resources, also play critical roles38. Furthermore, individual psychological traits such as optimism, self-efficacy, and prior coping history shape how patients respond to their diagnosis39,40. Healthcare providers can support adaptation by fostering open communication, validating patients’ emotions, and offering targeted psychosocial interventions aimed at building adaptive coping skills and enhancing emotional well-being (Table 1).

Resilience pathways and protective factors

Resilience in lung cancer patients refers to their capacity to maintain or regain psychological well-being despite the substantial physical and emotional challenges posed by the disease41. This dynamic process enables patients to adapt positively to adversity, reducing the impact of distress and enhancing quality of life. Resilience is not a fixed trait but rather a multifaceted construct influenced by individual characteristics, social contexts, and external support systems18. A key pathway to resilience involves social support, which acts as a crucial buffer against the isolating effects of lung cancer42. Family members, friends, support groups, and healthcare providers offer emotional comfort, practical assistance, and a sense of belonging, helping patients navigate the uncertainties of their illness43. Social connectedness fosters hope and reinforces patients’ sense of identity and purpose, which are often threatened by the disease. Peer support groups, in particular, provide a unique platform for sharing experiences, normalizing feelings, and learning coping skills from others facing similar challenges.

Spirituality and meaning-making also play important roles in fostering resilience44,45. Many lung cancer patients draw on spiritual beliefs or personal values to find meaning in their illness experience, which can mitigate existential distress and promote acceptance6.

This process of meaning-making helps patients reframe their cancer journey as part of a larger life narrative, enhancing psychological flexibility and emotional regulation. Therapeutic interventions such as meaning-centered psychotherapy and mindfulness-based approaches have been shown to strengthen this pathway, equipping patients with skills to manage suffering and foster hope47. Individual psychological factors such as optimism, cognitive flexibility, and prior coping experiences contribute to resilience by enabling patients to respond adaptively to stressors48,49. Optimism supports positive expectations for the future and motivates engagement with treatment and self-care. Cognitive flexibility allows patients to adjust their thoughts and attitudes in response to changing circumstances, facilitating acceptance and emotional balance50,51. Importantly, resilience is cultivated through learning and practice, meaning that psychological interventions can enhance these adaptive capacities even in the face of severe illness.

Role of healthcare providers

Healthcare providers play a pivotal role in supporting lung cancer patients’ psychological adaptation and resilience throughout the illness trajectory52. Given the complex emotional and cognitive challenges associated with lung cancer diagnosis and treatment, providers must go beyond the traditional biomedical model to address patients’ psychosocial needs comprehensively. Empathic communication is foundational, allowing patients to feel heard, validated, and supported in expressing fears, concerns, and uncertainties53,54. Early identification and routine screening for psychological distress are essential components of quality cancer care. Tools such as the Distress Thermometer or Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) can help clinicians detect anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues that may otherwise go unrecognized55. Prompt referral to psycho-oncology specialists or mental health professionals ensures timely inter-vention, which can mitigate symptom severity and improve patients’ coping capacity.

Multidisciplinary care models that integrate psychosocial support with medical treatment have been shown to enhance patient outcomes56-58. Psycho-oncologists, social workers, nurses, and counselors collaborate to provide tailored inter-ventions including cognitive-behavioral therapy, mindfulness training, and supportive counseling59,60. Educating healthcare teams to recognize signs of maladaptive coping, stigma-related distress, and identity disruption further enhances care quality. Ultimately, a holistic approach that addresses the physical, emotional, and social dimensions of lung cancer fosters resilience, promotes treatment adherence, and improves overall quality of life61.

The impact of lung cancer symptoms on psychological well-being

Lung cancer patients frequently endure a constellation of debilitating physical symptoms that exert a profound influence on their psychological well-being. Common symptoms such as persistent cough, dyspnea (shortness of breath), chest pain, fatigue, and weight loss are not only distressing in themselves but also serve as constant reminders of the severity of the disease.62 These symptoms contribute significantly to emotional distress, increasing the risk of anxiety, depression, and feelings of helplessness63. For many patients, the unpredictability and chronic nature of these symptoms can lead to heightened psychological vulnerability. Dyspnea, in particular, stands out as one of the most feared and anxiety-provoking symptoms among lung cancer patients64. The sensation of breathlessness often triggers panic attacks and catastrophic thoughts about suffocation or imminent death. This fear can exacerbate respiratory difficulties, creating a feedback loop wherein anxiety intensifies dyspnea, and worsening dyspnea increases anxiety. Such symptom-driven psychological distress can impair patients’ ability to engage in daily activities, reduce social interactions, and diminish overall quality of life65.

Fatigue, another pervasive symptom in lung cancer, has a multifactorial origin including disease burden, treatment side effects, and psychological factors such as depression and sleep disturbances66. Cancer-related fatigue is often described as overwhelming and unrelenting, severely limiting physical functioning and contributing to feelings of frustration and demoralization67. The cumulative effect of physical symptoms and psychological distress can lead to social withdrawal, impaired coping capacity, and decreased adherence to treatment regimens. Effective symptom management is therefore crucial not only for physical comfort but also for mitigating psychological distress. Interventions may include pharmacologic treatments such as opioids for pain and dyspnea, corticosteroids, and non-pharmacologic approaches including pulmonary rehabilitation, breathing techniques, energy conservation strategies, and psychological therapies targeting anxiety and depression68. Comprehensive symptom assessment and integrative care models that address both physical and emotional symptoms are essential to improving patients’ mental health and enhancing their capacity to cope with the challenges posed by lung cancer69.

The role of social determinants in coping and resilience

Social determinants of health including socio-economic status, education, cultural background, and social support play a pivotal role in shaping how lung cancer patients cope with their diagnosis and build resilience70-72. Patients from lower socioeconomic backgrounds often face additional challenges such as limited access to quality healthcare, financial strain, and inadequate transportation, which can increase stress and impede timely treatment73,74. These barriers can undermine psychological well-being and hinder adaptive coping, leading to worse outcomes both physically and emotionally. Educational level also influences patients’ understanding of their illness and treatment options, affecting their ability to engage actively in decision-making and self-management75. Lower health literacy can result in feelings of confusion, fear, and helplessness, thereby exacerbating psychological distress76. Conversely, patients with higher health literacy may employ more effective coping strategies and demonstrate greater resilience in managing the complexities of their illness.

Cultural beliefs and norms further shape patients’ experiences of lung cancer and their coping mechanisms77. For example, in some cultures, lung cancer may carry significant stigma, particularly due to its association with smoking, leading to self-blame and social isolation78. Cultural perceptions about illness and death may influence patients’ willingness to seek psychological support or discuss emotional concerns openly. Health professionals must be culturally sensitive and aware of these factors to provide tailored psychosocial care that respects patients’ backgrounds and values79. Social support from family, friends, and community networks is a well-documented protective factor that buffers against psychological distress and fosters resilience80. Emotional support, practical assistance, and a sense of belonging enhance patients’ capacity to cope with the multifaceted challenges of lung cancer81. Conversely, social isolation or strained relationships can increase vulnerability to depression and anxiety. Interventions aimed at strengthening social networks and community engagement can therefore significantly improve psychological adaptation and quality of life.

Influence of family and caregivers on patient psychological adaptation

Family members and caregivers are often the primary source of emotional and practical support for lung cancer patients, playing a crucial role in shaping patients’ psychological adaptation to their illness82. The diagnosis of lung cancer can trigger significant emotional upheaval not only for patients but also for their close relatives, who frequently assume care giving responsibilities83. This dyadic relationship means that caregivers’ well-being and coping strategies directly influence the patient’s mental health and resilience. Emotional support from family and caregivers including empathy, reassurance, and encouragement provides patients with a sense of security and belonging, which helps buffer against feelings of anxiety, depression, and isolation84. Practical assistance with daily activities, medical appointments, and treatment management further alleviates patient stress and promotes a sense of control amid the uncertainty of illness. The presence of a supportive caregiver can enhance patients’ motivation to adhere to treatment regimens and engage actively in their care85.

However, care giving can be a double-edged sword. 

The intense physical and emotional demands placed on caregivers often lead to caregiver burden, characterized by stress, fatigue, and psychological distress86. Caregivers who struggle with their own mental health may inadvertently diminish the quality of support they provide, impacting the patient’s psychological adaptation negatively87. Therefore, it is critical to assess and support caregiver well-being through counseling, respite care, and educational resources. Family dynamics and communication patterns also significantly influence psychological adaptation88. Open, honest discussions about diagnosis, prognosis, and emotional concerns foster mutual understanding and shared coping, while conflict or avoidance can exacerbate distress for all involved. Family-centered psychosocial interventions that include both patients and caregivers can improve communication, reduce emotional burden, and strengthen adaptive coping mechanisms89.

Psychological interventions and therapies

Psychological interventions play a vital role in supporting lung cancer patients as they navigate the emotional challenges posed by their diagnosis and treatment90. Given the high prevalence of anxiety, depression, and existential distress among this population, targeted therapies aim to enhance coping skills, reduce psychological symptoms, and improve overall quality of life.

Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT) 

It is one of the most extensively studied approaches in oncology settings. CBT helps patients identify and modify negative thought patterns and maladaptive behaviors related to their illness, such as catastrophic thinking about symptoms or feelings of hopelessness91. By fostering more adaptive cognitive appraisals and coping mechanisms, CBT has been shown to reduce anxiety and depression, enhance emotional regulation, and improve treatment adherence92.

Mindfulness-Based Interventions (MBIs) 

It have gained prominence as effective tools for managing cancer-related distress. Techniques such as mindfulness meditation, body scan, and mindful breathing cultivate present-moment awareness and acceptance of uncomfortable thoughts and emotions93. MBIs can reduce rumination, improve stress tolerance, and alleviate symptoms of anxiety and depression, while also helping patients manage physical symptoms like pain and dyspnea.

Meaning-Centered Psychotherapy (MCP) 

It addresses the existential concerns that often arise with a life-threatening diagnosis. By helping patients explore sources of meaning, purpose, and legacy, MCP fosters spiritual well-being and hope, reducing feelings of despair and isolation94. This approach is particularly valuable for patients facing advanced disease or palliative care.

Supportive-expressive group therapy

It provides a forum for patients to share experiences, express emotions, and receive social support from peers facing similar challenges. Group therapy can diminish feelings of isolation, reduce stigma, and promote collective resilience95.  Peer support networks, both in-person and online, also offer ongoing emotional connection and practical advice.

In addition to these evidence-based therapies, psycho education about the disease, treatment side effects, and symptom management empowers patients to engage actively in their care96,97. Education combined with skills training such as relaxation techniques, problem-solving, and communication skills can enhance patients’ sense of control and self-efficacy. Healthcare providers should assess patients’ psychological needs routinely and tailor interventions to individual preferences, cultural backgrounds, and stages of illness98. Integrating mental health professionals into multidisciplinary oncology teams facilitates timely referral and comprehensive care. Overall, psychological therapies are essential components of holistic lung cancer management, promoting emotional resilience and improving patients’ quality of life.

The intersection of lung cancer and stigma: Psychological consequences and coping

Lung cancer is uniquely burdened by stigma, often linked to its strong association with smoking and perceptions of self-infliction. This stigma profoundly affects patients’ psychological well-being, complicating their emotional adaptation and coping processes. Patients frequently internalize societal blame, experiencing feelings of shame, guilt, and self-recrimination that can intensify depression and anxiety99. The internalized stigma may lead to diminished self-esteem and identity disruption, compounding the psychological toll of the disease beyond the physical symptoms and treatment burdens. Social stigma can also manifest in external discrimination, including negative attitudes from healthcare providers, family members, or peers100. Such experiences can discourage patients from seeking social support or disclosing their diagnosis, thereby fostering isolation and loneliness. The fear of judgment may inhibit patients from accessing psychological services or participating fully in treatment, adversely affecting adherence and health outcomes. Moreover, stigma can exacerbate disparities in care, particularly for marginalized groups who face intersectional stigma based on race, socioeconomic status, or other factors101.

Coping with stigma requires multi-level strategies. On an individual level, psychological interventions such as cognitive-behavioral therapy can help patients reframe self-blaming thoughts and build self-compassion102. Peer support groups offer a validating environment where patients can share experiences and reduce feelings of isolation. At the community and societal levels, public health campaigns aimed at reducing lung cancer stigma and increasing awareness of its complex etiology are critical. Healthcare providers have a vital role in fostering a non-judgmental, supportive atmosphere, actively addressing stigma, and encouraging open communication103.

Longitudinal perspectives on coping and psychological adaptation

Coping with lung cancer is a dynamic process that evolves over time, influenced by changing physical symptoms, treatment phases, and psychosocial circumstances104. Longitudinal studies offer critical insights into how patients’ psychological adaptation unfolds from diagnosis through treatment, survivorship, or end-of-life care. Understanding these trajectories helps identify critical periods of vulnerability and resilience, enabling timely and targeted psychosocial interventions. In the initial phase following diagnosis, patients commonly experience shock, fear, and uncertainty, which may trigger acute distress and maladaptive coping strategies such as denial or avoidance. Over time, many patients gradually adjust by developing acceptance and employing problem-focused coping mechanisms, such as seeking information and mobilizing social support105. However, this adaptation is not linear; patients often experience fluctuations in psychological well-being, influenced by treatment side effects, disease progression, or changes in personal circumstances.

During active treatment, psychological distress may peak due to the cumulative burden of symptoms and treatment-related toxicities. Resilience during this phase is often supported by effective symptom management, strong social networks, and access to psychological care18. Survivorship introduces new challenges, including fear of recurrence, identity shifts, and long-term physical limitations, requiring ongoing adjustment. For patients with advanced disease, coping strategies may shift toward meaning-making, legacy building, and preparing for end-of-life, underscoring the need for palliative and psychosocial support106. Longitudinal research also highlights the importance of early psychosocial assessment and continuous monitoring to capture evolving needs. Personalized interventions that adapt to the changing psychological landscape can foster sustained resilience and improve quality of life throughout the lung cancer trajectory107.

Future directions and research priorities

The psychological dimensions of coping and resilience in lung cancer patients remain an evolving field that calls for further exploration to improve patient-centered care. Future research should focus on longitudinal, multi-site studies that capture the diverse experiences of lung cancer patients across different stages of disease, treatment modalities, and demographic backgrounds. This will enable a nuanced understanding of how coping mechanisms and psychological adaptation vary over time and across populations, informing more tailored interventions. Advancements in digital health and telepsychology present promising avenues for expanding access to psychological support, particularly for patients in remote or underserved areas. Future research should investigate the efficacy, feasibility, and acceptability of virtual interventions, mobile applications, and online peer support communities tailored specifically for lung cancer patients. These technologies could help bridge gaps in care and provide continuous support throughout the cancer journey.

Another priority is to deepen understanding of the biological underpinnings of psychological resilience in lung cancer, including neurobiological and immunological correlates. Integrating psychosocial and biomedical research may uncover novel biomarkers predictive of psychological outcomes, paving the way for personalized mental health care. Additionally, there is a need to explore the impact of social determinants such as socioeconomic status, race, and cultural factors on psychological adaptation, resilience pathways, and treatment disparities. Developing culturally sensitive, stigma-reducing interventions is crucial, given the unique burden of lung cancer stigma on patients’ mental health. Research should evaluate community-based educational programs and health policy initiatives that address stigma and promote equity in cancer care. Finally, integrating caregiver focused interventions and assessing their effects on both patient and caregiver psychological well-being warrant further attention.

 

CONCLUSIONS

 

Lung cancer presents profound psychological challenges that significantly affect patients’ quality of life and treatment outcomes. Coping with this illness involves complex processes of psychological adaptation and resilience, which are influenced by individual traits, social support, spirituality, and the quality of healthcare interventions. Adaptive coping strategies and resilience pathways help patients manage distress, maintain hope, and reconstruct their identities in the face of adversity. Healthcare providers have a critical role in recognizing and addressing the psychological needs of lung cancer patients through empathic communication, routine distress screening, and integrated psychosocial care. Tailored interventions that enhance coping skills and promote resilience can substantially improve patients’ emotional well-being and engagement with treatment. Reducing stigma and fostering supportive environments are equally important in facilitating positive psychological adaptation.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

 

The authors would like to thank Africa University, Zimbabwe to provide necessary facilities for this work.

 

AUTHOR'S CONTRIBUTION

 

Obeagu EI: conceived the idea, writing the manuscript, literature survey. Parray AR: formal analysis, critical review. Final manuscript was checked and approved by the both authors.

 

DATA AVAILABILITY

 

Data will be made available on request.                        

      

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

  

None to declare.

 

REFERENCES

 
1. Thandra KC, Barsouk A, Saginala K, et al. Epidemiology of lung cancer. Cont Onco 2021;25(1):45-52. https://doi.org/10.5114/wo.2021.103829
2. De Groot PM, Wu CC, Carter BW, et al. The epidemiology of lung cancer. Trans Lung Canc Res 2018;7(3):220. https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr.2018.05.06
3. Morrison EJ, Novotny PJ, Sloan JA, et al. Emotional problems, quality of life, and symptom burden in patients with lung cancer. Clin Lung Canc 2017;18(5):497-503.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2017.02.008
4. Yang P. Epidemiology of lung cancer prognosis: Quantity and quality of life. Canc Epide 2009:469-486.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-416-2_24
5. Jeske M, James J, Joyce K. Diagnosis and the practices of patienthood: How diagnostic journeys shape illness experiences. Socio Health Illn 2024;46(S1):225-241.https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.13614
6. Hammerschmidt S, Wirtz H. Lung cancer: Current diagnosis and treatment. Germ Med J Inter. 2009;106(49):809.https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2009.0809
7. Avancini A, Belluomini L, Borsati A, et al. Integrating supportive care into the multidisciplinary management of lung cancer: We can’t wait any longer. Expe Rev Anticanc Thera 2022;22(7):725-735.https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2022.2082410
8. Mosher CE, Ott MA, Hanna N, et al. Coping with physical and psychological symptoms: A qualitative study of advanced lung cancer patients and their family caregivers. Supp Care Canc 2015;23:2053-60.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2566-8
9. Henoch I, Bergman B, Danielson E. Dyspnea experience and management strategies in patients with lung cancer. Psycho‐Onco: J Psych, Soc Behav Dimen Canc 2008;17(7):709-715. https:/doi.org/10.1002/pon.1304
10. Tekdemir R, Kaya S, Aksoy İ, et al. Anticipatory grief and its associated factors in lung cancer patients. Neuro Inves 2024;62(3).
11. Chapple A, Ziebland S, McPherson A. Stigma, shame, and blame experienced by patients with lung cancer: Quali study 2004;328(7454):1470.https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38111.639734.7C
12. Missel M, Pedersen JH, Hendriksen C, et al. Regaining familiarity with own body after treatment for operable lung cancer–a qualitative longitudinal exploration. Euro J Canc Care 2016;25(6):1076-1090.https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.1238
13. Wu GX, Raz DJ, Brown L, et al. Psychological burden associated with lung cancer screening: A systematic review. Clin Lung Canc 2016;17(5):315-324.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2016.03.007
14. Chambers SK, Baade P, Youl P, et al. Psychological distress and quality of life in lung cancer: The role of health‐related stigma, illness appraisals and social constraints. Psych‐Oncol 2015;24(11):1569-1577.https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3829
15. Lebel S, Feldstain A, McCallum M, et al. Do behavioural self-blame and stigma predict positive health changes in survivors of lung or head and neck cancers? Psych Health 2013;28(9):1066-1081.https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2013.781602
16. Parray AR, Mujeeb KB, Khan SM. Explore situations that generate the emotions of regret and disappointment. J Indi Acad Appl Psych 2024:341.
17. Ernst J, Köditz AK, Goerling U, et al. Perceived stigmatization in cancer patients during the first year after diagnosis: The role of socioeconomic status. J Canc Surv 2025:1-2.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-025-01834-0
18. Seiler A, Jenewein J. Resilience in cancer patients. Front Psych 2019;10:208.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00208
19. Yin Y, Lyu M, Chen Y, et al. Self-efficacy and positive coping mediate the relationship between social support and resilience in patients undergoing lung cancer treatment: A cross-sectional study. Front Psych 2022; 13:953491. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.953491
20. Hu T, Xiao J, Peng J, et al. Relationship between resilience, social support as well as anxiety/depression of lung cancer patients: A cross-sectional observation study. J Canc Res Therap 2018;14(1):72-77.https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_849_17
21. Wang Q, Zhou M, Zhao D, et al. Effects of resilience-promoting interventions on cancer patients’ positive adaptation and quality of life: A meta-analysis. Canc Nurs 2023;46(6): E343-354.https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000001138
22. Lutgendorf SK, Antoni MH, Ironson G, et al. Changes in cognitive coping skills and social support during cognitive behavioral stress management intervention and distress outcomes in symptomatic human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-seropositive gay men. Psych Med 1998;60(2):204-214.https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-199803000-00017
23. Van de Wiel M, Derijcke S, Galdermans D, et al. Coping strategy influences quality of life in patients with advanced lung cancer by mediating mood. Clin Lung Canc 2021;22(2): e146-152.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2020.09.010
24. Cao W, Qi X, Cai DA, et al. Modeling posttraumatic growth among cancer patients: The roles of social support, appraisals, and adaptive coping. Psych‐oncol 2018;27(1):208-215. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4395
25. Vos MS, Putter H, Van Houwelingen HC, et al. Denial and social and emotional outcomes in lung cancer patients: The protective effect of denial. Lung Canc 2011;72(1):119-124.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2010.07
26. Lehto RH. Psychosocial challenges for patients with advanced lung cancer: Interventions to improve well-being. Lung Canc: Targ Thera 2017:79-90.https://doi.org/10.2147/LCTT.S120215
27. Elkefi S, Trapani D, Ryan S. The role of digital health in supporting cancer patients' mental health and psychological well-being for a better quality of life: A systematic literature review. Inter J Med Infor 2023;176:105065.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105065
28. Watson M, Dunn J. The multidisciplinary art and science of cancer care: Integrating psycho-oncology. Futur Oncol 2016;12(24):2775-8.https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2016-0374
29. Singer S, Danker H, Meixensberger J, et al. Structured multi-disciplinary psychosocial care for cancer patients and the perceived quality of care from the patient perspective: A cluster-randomized trial. J Canc Res Clin Oncol 2019; 145:2845-254.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-019-03018-7
30. Kurita K, Garon EB, Stanton AL, et al. Uncertainty and psychological adjustment in patients with lung cancer. Psych‐Oncol 2013;22(6):1396-1401.https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3155
31. Goldberg RJ, Cullen LO. Factors important to psychosocial adjustment to cancer: A review of the evidence. Soc Sci Med 1985;20(8):803-807.https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(85)90334-x
32. Niknamian S. The impact of stress, anxiety, fear and depression in the cause of cancer in humans. Ameri J Bio Sci Res 2019;3(4):363-370.https://doi.org/ 10.34297/AJBSR.2019.03.000696
33. Liao YC, Liao WY, Sun JL, et al. Psychological distress and coping strategies among women with incurable lung cancer: A qualitative study. Supp Care Canc 2018;26:989-996.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3919-x
34. Wild ND, Paivio SC. Psychological adjustment, coping, and emotion regulation as predictors of posttraumatic growth. J Aggr Malt Trau 2004;8(4):97-122.https://doi.org/10.1300/J146v08n04_05
35. Su CH, Liu Y, Hsu HT, et al. Cancer fear, emotion regulation, and emotional distress in patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer. Canc Nurs 2024;47(1):56-63.https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000001150
36. Yang Y, Qian X, Tang X, et al. The links between symptom burden, illness perception, psychological resilience, social support, coping modes, and cancer-related worry in Chinese early-stage lung cancer patients after surgery: A cross-sectional study. BMC psych 2024;12(1):463.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01946-9
37. Ristevska-Dimitrovska G, Filov I, Rajchanovska D, et al. Resilience and quality of life in breast cancer patients. Open Acc Mace J Med Sci 2015;3(4):727.
https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2015.128
38. Zhang J, Yin Y, Wang A, et al. Resilience in patients with lung cancer: Structural equation modeling. Canc Nurs 2021;44(6):465-472.https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000000838
39. Yin Y, Lyu M, Chen Y, et al. Self-efficacy and positive coping mediate the relationship between social support and resilience in patients undergoing lung cancer treatment: A cross-sectional study. Front Psych 2022; 13:953491. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.953491
40. Udeze CN, Ezenwa MO, Obi-Nwosu H, et al. Personality traits, self-efficacy, family support and knowledge of illness as predictors of adaptive coping among breast cancer patients. Pract Psych 2023;13(1).
41. Guo J, Zhu J, Li X, et al. Exploring barriers to resilience among preoperative non-small cell lung cancer patients: A qualitative study in China. BMC Nurs 2025;24(1):1-0. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03158-x
42. Sippel LM, Pietrzak RH, Charney DS, et al. How does social support enhance resilience in the trauma-exposed individual? Ecol Soci 2015;20(4).https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07832-200410
43. Zhang Y, Ding Y, Liu C, et al. Relationships among perceived social support, family resilience, and caregiver burden in lung cancer families: A mediating model. Semi Oncol Nurs 2023; 39 (3): 151356.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2022.151356
44. Theron LC, Theron AM. Meaning-making and resilience: Case studies of a multifaceted process. J Psych Africa 2014;24(1):24-32.https://doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2014.904099
45. Jones K, Simpson GK, Briggs L, et al. Does spirituality facilitate adjustment and resilience among individuals and families after SCI? Disab Rehab 2016;38(10):921-935.
46. Kruizinga R, Hartog ID, Jacobs M, et al. The effect of spiritual interventions addressing existential themes using a narrative approach on quality of life of cancer patients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Psycho Oncol 2016;25(3):253-265.
47. Milbury K, Li Y, Durrani S, et al. A mindfulness‐based intervention as a supportive care strategy for patients with metastatic non‐small cell lung cancer and their spouses: Results of a three‐arm pilot randomized controlled trial. The Oncol 2020;25(11): e1794-802.https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0125
48. Benight CC, Cieslak R. Cognitive factors and resilience: How selfefficacy contributes to coping with adversities. Resi Mental Health: Chall Acro Life 2011:45-55.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511994791
49. Basińska MA, Sołtys M. Personal resources and flexibility in coping with stress depending on perceived stress in a group of cancer patients. Health Psych Repor 2020;8(2):107-119.https://doi.org/10.5114/hpr.2020.93781
50. Eggen AC, Richard NM, Bosma I, et al. Factors associated with cognitive impairment and cognitive concerns in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Neuro Oncol Prac 2022;9(1):50-58.https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npab056
51. Kousha MD, Shahabizadeh F, Ahi G. Effectiveness of group cognitive behavioral therapy on depression, cognitive flexibility, and cognitive regulation of emotion in women with breast cancer. Health Tech Assess Action 2022. https://doi.org/10.18502/htaa.v6i3.12433
52. Presley CJ, Arrato NA, Shields PG, et al. Functional trajectories and resilience among adults with advanced lung cancer. JTO Clin Res Rep 2022;3(6):100334.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtocrr.2022.100334
53. Dean M, Street Jr RL. A 3-stage model of patient-centered communication for addressing cancer patients’ emotional distress. Patient Edu Coun 2014;94(2):143-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2013.09.025
54. Dean M, Street RL. Patient-centered communication. Palli Care Comm 2015:238-245.https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780190201708.003.0029
55. Boyes A, D’Este C, Carey M, et al. How does the distress thermometer compare to the hospital anxiety and depression scale for detecting possible cases of psychological morbidity among cancer survivors? Supp Care Cancer 2013;21:119-127.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1499-3
56. Patel A, Jafferany M. Multidisciplinary and holistic models of care for patients with dermatologic disease and psychosocial comorbidity: A systematic review. JAMA Derma 2020;156(6):686-694.https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.0394
57. Hardavella G, Frille A, Theochari C, et al. Multidisciplinary care models for patients with lung cancer. Breath 2021;16(4).https://doi.org/10.1183/20734735.0076-2020
58. Heinke MY, Vinod SK. A review on the impact of lung cancer multidisciplinary care on patient outcomes. Trans Lung Canc Res 2020;9(4):1639.https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr.2019.11.03
59. Lau BH, Chow AY, Ng TK, et al. Comparing the efficacy of integrative body-mind-spirit intervention with cognitive behavioral therapy in patient-caregiver parallel groups for lung cancer patients using a randomized controlled trial. J Psych Oncol 2020;38(4):389-405.https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2020.1722981
60. Sheikhzadeh M, Zanjani Z, Baari A. Efficacy of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety, depression, and fatigue in cancer patients: A randomized clinical trial. Iran J Psych 2021;16(3):271. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijps.v16i3.6252
61. Hofman A, Zajdel N, Klekowski J, et al. Improving social support to increase QoL in lung cancer patients. Canc Manag Res 2021:2319-2327.https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S278087
62. Molassiotis A, Lowe M, Blackhall F, et al. A qualitative exploration of a respiratory distress symptom cluster in lung cancer: Cough, breathlessness and fatigue. Lung Canc 2011;71(1):94-102.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2010.04.002
63. Gonzalez-Ling A, Vázquez OG, Bello ME, et al. Quality of life, anxiety, depression, and distress in patients with advanced and metastatic lung cancer. Palli Supp Care 2023;21(4):608-615.https://doi.org/10.1017/S147895152200116X
64. Jones C. The management of respiratory symtpoms and advanced COPD. Hand Palli Care 2012:160-183.
65. Fang CY, Manne SL, Pape SJ. Functional impairment, marital quality, and patient psychological distress as predictors of psychological distress among cancer patients' spouses. Health Psych 2001;20(6):452. PMID: 11714188
66. Carnio S, Di Stefano RF, Novello S. Fatigue in lung cancer patients: Symptom burden and management of challenges. Lung Canc: Targ Thera 2016:73-82.https://doi.org/10.2147/LCTT.S85334
67. Mitchell S. Cancer-related fatigue. Canc Nurs: Princ Pract 2011:772-91.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.03.024
68. Shinde AM, Dashti A. Palliative care in lung cancer. Lung Canc: Treat Res 2016:225-250.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40389-2_11
69. Deng GE, Rausch SM, Jones LW, et al. Complementary therapies and integrative medicine in lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer: American college of chest physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2013;143(5): e420S-36S.https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.12-2364
70. Daniel H, Bornstein SS, Kane GC. Health and public policy committee of the American college of physicians. Addressing social determinants to improve patient care and promote health equity: An American college of physician’s position paper. Annal Inter Med 2018;168(8):577-578. https://doi.org/10.7326/M17-2441
71. Teteh DK, Ferrell B, Okunowo O, et al. Social determinants of health and lung cancer surgery: A qualitative study. Front Pub Health. 2023; 11:1285419.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1285419
72. Shin D, Fishman MD, Ngo M, et al. The impact of social determinants of health on lung cancer screening utilization. J Ameri Colle Radio 2022;19(1):122-130.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2021.08.026
73. Kangovi S, Barg FK, Carter T, et al. Challenges faced by patients with low socioeconomic status during the post-hospital transition. J Gen Inter Med 2014;29(2):283-289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-013-2571-5
74. Montazeri A, Hole DJ, Milroy R, et al. Quality of life in lung cancer patients: Does socioeconomic status matter? Health Qual Life Outc 2003;1(1):19.https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-1-19
75. Willén L, Berglund A, Bergström S, et al. Educational level and management and outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer. A nationwide population-based study. Lung Canc 2019; 131:40-46.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.03.004
76. Yang L, Liu J, Liu Q, et al. The relationships among symptom experience, family support, health literacy, and fear of progression in advanced lung cancer patients. J Adva Nurs 2023;79(9):3549-3558.https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15692
77. Lin JJ, Mhango G, Wall MM, et al. Cultural factors associated with racial disparities in lung cancer care. Annal Ameri Thora Soci 2014;11(4):489-495.https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201402-055OC
78. Lehto RH. Patient views on smoking, lung cancer, and stigma: a focus group perspective. Europ J Onco Nurs 2014;18(3):316-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2014.02.003
79. Tucker CM, Arthur TM, Roncoroni J, et al. Patient-centered, culturally sensitive health care. Ameri J Life Med 2015;9(1):63-77. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022967
80. Downe-Wamboldt B, Butler L, Coulter L. The relationship between meaning of illness, social support, coping strategies, and quality of life for lung cancer patients and their family members. Canc Nurs 2006;29(2):111-19.https://doi.org/10.1097/00002820-200603000-00006
81. Hofman A, Zajdel N, Klekowski J, et al. Improving social support to increase QoL in lung cancer patients. Canc Manag Res 2021:2319-23127.https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S278087
82. Mosher CE, Jaynes HA, Hanna N, et al. Distressed family caregivers of lung cancer patients: An examination of psychosocial and practical challenges. Supp Care Canc 2013;21(2):431-437.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1532-6
83. Mosher CE, Ott MA, Hanna N, et al. Coping with physical and psychological symptoms: A qualitative study of advanced lung cancer patients and their family caregivers. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2015;23(7):2053-2060. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2566-8
84. Bakas T, Lewis RR, Parsons JE. Caregiving tasks among family caregivers of patients with lung cancer. InOncology nursing forum 2001; 28 (5). PMID: 11421144
85. Harvey-Knowles J, Faw MH. Caregiver social support quality when interacting with cancer survivors: advancing the dual-process model of supportive communication. Supp Care Canc 2018;26(4):1281-1288.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3951-x
86. Bevans M, Sternberg EM. Caregiving burden, stress, and health effects among family caregivers of adult cancer patients. JAMA 2012;307(4):398-403.https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.29
87. Mosher CE, Bakas T, Champion VL. Physical health, mental health, and life changes among family caregivers of patients with lung cancer. Onco Nurs Forum 2013; 40 (1). https:/doi.org/10.1188/13.ONF.53-61
88. Siminoff LA, Wilson‐Genderson M, Baker Jr S. Depressive symptoms in lung cancer patients and their family caregivers and the influence of family environment. Psych Onco 2010;19(12):1285-1293.https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1696
89. Zhang Y, Tang R, Bi L, et al. Effects of family-centered positive psychological intervention on psychological health and quality of life in patients with breast cancer and their caregivers. Supp Care Canc 2023;31(10):592.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-023-08053-2
90. Zhao X, Cui L, Wang W, et al. Influence of psychological intervention on pain and immune functions of patients receiving lung cancer surgery. Pakis J Med Sci 2016;32(1):155.https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.321.8935
91. Greer JA, Park ER, Prigerson HG, et al. Tailoring cognitive-behavioral therapy to treat anxiety comorbid with advanced cancer. J Cogn Psycho 2010;24(4):294.https://doi.org/10.1891/0889-8391.24.4.294
92. Sutanto YS, Ibrahim D, Septiawan D, et al. Effect of cognitive behavioral therapy on improving anxiety, depression, and quality of life in pre-diagnosed lung cancer patients. Asia Paci J Canc Prev 2021;22(11):3455.https://doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.11.3455
93. McDonnell KK, Gallerani DG, Newsome BR, et al. A prospective pilot study evaluating feasibility and preliminary effects of breathe easier: A mindfulness-based intervention for survivors of lung cancer and their family members (Dyads). Integ Canc Therap 2020; 19:1534735420969829.https://doi.org/10.1177/1534735420969829
94. Sun V, Kim JY, Irish TL et al. Palliative care and spiritual well‐being in lung cancer patients and family caregivers. Psych Onco 2016;25(12):1448-1455.https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3987
95. Lehto RH, Wyatt G. Perceptions about using mindfulness therapy: A lung cancer focus group study. Canc Nurs 2013;36(4): E51-60.https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0b013e31826d2f16
96. Golant M, Altman T, Martin C. Managing cancer side effects to improve quality of life: A cancer psychoeducation program. Canc Nurs 2003;26(1):37-44.https://doi.org/10.1097/00002820-200302000-00005
97. Hsieh CC, Hsiao FH. The effects of supportive care interventions on depressive symptoms among patients with lung cancer: A metaanalysis of randomized controlled studies. Palli Supp Care 2017;15(6):710-723.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951517000335
98. Liao YC, Liao WY, Shun SC, et al. Symptoms, psychological distress, and supportive care needs in lung cancer patients. Supp Care Canc 2011;19(11):1743-1751.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-010-1014-7
99. Williamson TJ, Ostroff JS, Haque N, et al. Dispositional shame and guilt as predictors of depressive symptoms and anxiety among adults with lung cancer: The mediational role of internalized stigma. Stigm Health 2020;5(4):425. https://doi.org/10.1037/sah0000214
100. Maguire R, Lewis L, Kotronoulas G, et al. Lung cancer stigma: A concept with consequences for patients. Canc Repor 2019;2(5):e1201.https://doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1201
101. Turan JM, Elafros MA, Logie CH, et al. Challenges and opportunities in examining and addressing intersectional stigma and health. Focus 2025;23(1):70-84.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-018-1246-9
102. Grossman M. Promoting emotion-regulating coping resilience. Promo Heal Resil People Canc: A Nurs Persp 2022: 163-199.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06101-1_9
103. Kato Jumba K. Exploring the impact of mindfulness-based stress reduction on disease progression and psychological well-being in lung cancer patients: A review. Inosr Exper Sci 2024;14(2):1-7 https://doi.org/10.59298/INOSRES/2024/142.110000
104. Henoch I, Bergman B, Gustafsson M, et al. The impact of symptoms, coping capacity, and social support on quality of life experience over time in patients with lung cancer. J Pain Symp Manag 2007;34(4):370-379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006
105. Kuo TT, Ma FC. Symptom distresses and coping strategies in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Canc Nurs 2002;25(4):309-17. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002820-200208000-00007
106. Nilsen M, Stalsberg R, Sand K, et al. Meaning making for psychological adjustment and quality of life in older long-term breast cancer survivors. Front Psych 2021; 12:734198. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.734198
107. Presley CJ, Arrato NA, Shields PG et al. Functional trajectories and resilience among adults with advanced lung cancer. JTO Clin Res Repo 2022;3(6):100334.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtocrr.2022.100334